Opinion

Stepney v. Beckwith

  • 392 F. App'x 167
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Aug 23, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Agee, Motz, Wilkinson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wade Stepney, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommenda *168 tion of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stepney v. Beckwith, No. 8:09-cv-00771-MBS, 2010 WL 293786 (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2010); 2009 WL 1357225 (May 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.