Opinion

Miller v. Cumberland County Bd. of Educ.

  • 986 F.2d 1414
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 9249
  • 1993 WL 36115
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 16, 1993
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

986 F.2d 1414

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gwendolyn J. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CUMBERLAND COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; David Dalton;

Marshall Faircloth; Miltin Yarboro; Michael Boose; Thomas

Council; Marta Bullard; Maureen Clark; Juanita Gonzales;

Mary E. Martin; Larry Rowedder; Mr. Riddle; Tyron

Lancaster; William T. Brown; James McKethan; Sophia

Pierce; Lisa Carter; Sylvia Smith; Mac Williams,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-2406.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1993

Decided: February 16, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-91-36-3-H)

Gwendolyn J. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Steven Craig Lawrence, Anderson, Broadfoot, Johnson & Pittman, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Gwendolyn J. Miller appeals from the district court's orders dismissing her employment discrimination action sua sponte after she twice failed to appear at scheduled pretrial conferences, and denying her Motion for Reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Cumberland County Bd. of Educ., No. CA-91-36-3-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 21 & 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.