Case law

Mud Lick Mining Corp. v. Hash

566 F. App'x 208 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 11, 2014

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Mud Lick Mining Corp. v. Hash, No. 11-0402 BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 29, 2012).

Eplion v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation

794 F.2d 935 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 25, 1986

Our review of the Benefits Review Board’s order is governed by § 21 of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 921 . 30 U.S.C. § 932 (a); Amigo Smokeless Coal Company v. … The Board must affirm the findings of fact of the AU if they are supported by substantial evidence. 33 U.S.C. § 921 (b)(3); Zbos-nik v. Badger Coal Co., 759 F.2d 1187 (4th Cir.1985).

Tolliver v. Eastern Associated Coal Co.

548 F. App'x 894 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 20, 2013

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Tolliver v. E. Assoc. Coal Corp., No. 1:12-0376-BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 20, 2013).

Edward Lee Bragg v. J.B. Metzger, III Virginia Parole Board

99 F.3d 1129 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 24, 1996

Edward Lee BRAGG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J.B. METZGER, III; Virginia Parole Board, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96-6728. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 17, 1996. Decided Oct. 24, 1996. … Bragg v. Metzger, No. CA-95-74-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 29, 1996).

Trump v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp.

599 F. App'x 117 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 10, 2015

PER CURIAM: Janice Faye Trump, on behalf of deceased former miner Jesse Willard Trump, seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of living miner benefits … Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Trump v.

Hazel H. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee

823 F.2d 793 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 14, 1987

See Lee v. Russell County Board of Education, 684 F.2d 769, 774 (11th Cir.1982). … Robinson also asserts that Montgomery Ward’s failure to post notice of job openings is either direct or indirect evidence of intentional discrimination, citing Brown v.

Morton v. Fahey

117 F. App'x 274 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 22, 2004

See Morton v. Fahey, No. CA-04-428-1 (E.D.Va. July 12, 2004).

United States v. Kenneth A. Wild, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Tyrone E. Greenfield

47 F.3d 669 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 2, 1995

Austin , — U.S. at -, 113 S.Ct. at 2805 (citation and internal quotes omitted); see also Browning-Ferris Indus. v. … Browning-Ferris Indus., 492 U.S. at 265 , 109 S.Ct. at 2915 .

Versatile v. Kelly

556 F. App'x 266 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 25, 2014

Versatile v. Kelly, No. 3:12-cv-00333-HEH, 2013 WL 4807554 (E.D.Va. Sept. 9, 2013).

United States v. Solomon

563 F.2d 1121 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 12, 1977

United States v. County School Board of Prince George County, 221 F.Supp. 93 (E.D.Va.1963); United States v. Biloxi Municipal School District, 219 F.Supp. 691 (S.D.Miss.1963), and United States v. … County School Board of Prince George County, Va., 221 F.Supp. 93, 103 (E.D.Va.1963) (educational impact funds); United States v.

Grant v. City of North Charleston Housing Authority

365 F. App'x 460 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 16, 2010

Grant v. City of North Charleston Hous. Auth., No. 2:06-cv-03242-CWH, 2008 WL 4372980 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008).

Kleeson Co. v. Blair

28 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 16, 1928

Avery v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 6 , 55 A. L. R. 1277; Royal Packing Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 536 ; Blair v. Curran (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 390 ; Henderson Iron Works v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Cruz v. Holder

356 F. App'x 651 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 2009

PER CURIAM: German Jose Cruz, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision finding Cruz removable and denying his … We have reviewed the administrative record and Cruz’s claims and find no error in the Board’s decision. See Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316 , 320-22 (4th Cir.2002).

B & G Building Maintenance, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

123 F. App'x 551 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 6, 2005

Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Assoc., 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993). The most important of these factors is the untimely party’s reason for delay. Thompson v. E.I. … Hospital Del Maestro v. NLRB, 263 F.3d 173, 175 (1st Cir. 2001).

Valley Camp Coal Co. v. Hill

537 F. App'x 253 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 8, 2013

Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. … Valley Camp Coal Co. v. Hill, No. 12-0112-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 2012).

Robertson v. Rogers

679 F.2d 1090 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 4, 1982

Robertson relies principally on the following language in Board of Regents v. … Of course, there was no such disparagement of Robertson's character. 8 In this case, the actual decision of the Board is shielded by Bishop v.

Eastman Kodak Company v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

704 F.2d 1319 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 14, 1983

Unlike reissue proceedings, interference proceedings are inter partes, and are conducted before the Board of Patent Interferences, a reviewing board separate from the Board of Appeals. Id. … See FTC v. Standard Oil Co. of Calif, 449 U.S. at 242 , 244 n. 11, 101 S.Ct. at 494 , 495 n. 11; Bally Mfg. Corp. v. Diamond, 629 F.2d 955, 960 (4th Cir.1980); Lee Pharmaceuticals v.

Huntington Alloys, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of America

623 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 12, 1980

See Detroit Coil Co. v. I. A. M. Lodge 82, 594 F.2d 575, 581 (6 Cir. 1979). … There is a dictum to that effect in West Rock Lodge No. 2120, Machinists v.

Union Carbide Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

25 F. App'x 87 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 14, 2001

 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,  Petitioner, v. … UNION CARBIDE CORP. v.

Messan v. Gonzales

213 F. App'x 217 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 9, 2007

PER CURIAM: Ayaba Mana Messan, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reconsider its prior order, which adopted and affirmed the … We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (a) (2006); Jean v.