Opinion

Grant v. City of North Charleston Housing Authority

  • 365 F. App'x 460
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 16, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Duncan, Michael, Motz
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

*461 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doris S. Grant appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting the Appellees’ summary judgment motion in Grant’s employment discrimination case brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grant v. City of North Charleston Hous. Auth., No. 2:06-cv-03242-CWH, 2008 WL 4372980 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.