Opinion

Mud Lick Mining Corp. v. Hash

  • 566 F. App'x 208
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 11, 2014
Status
Published
On the bench
Floyd, Niemeyer, Shedd
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mud Lick Mining Corporation and American Mining Insurance Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Mud Lick Mining Corp. v. Hash, No. 11-0402 BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.