Case law

Morton v. Roanoke City Mills, Inc.

15 F.2d 545 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 19, 1926

See, also, Wiggins v. Burkham, 10 Wall. 129 , 19 L. Ed. 884 ; Nunez v. Dautel, 19 Wall. 560 , 22 L. Ed. 161 . … See Gillis v. Cobe, 177 Mass. 584 , 59 N. E. 455 ; Skowhegan Water Co. v. Skowhegan Village Corp., 102 Me. 323 , 66 A. 714 . Affirmed.

Grant v. City of North Charleston Housing Authority

365 F. App'x 460 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 16, 2010

Grant v. City of North Charleston Hous. Auth., No. 2:06-cv-03242-CWH, 2008 WL 4372980 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2008).

Eastman Kodak Company v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks

704 F.2d 1319 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 14, 1983

Unlike reissue proceedings, interference proceedings are inter partes, and are conducted before the Board of Patent Interferences, a reviewing board separate from the Board of Appeals. Id. … See FTC v. Standard Oil Co. of Calif, 449 U.S. at 242 , 244 n. 11, 101 S.Ct. at 494 , 495 n. 11; Bally Mfg. Corp. v. Diamond, 629 F.2d 955, 960 (4th Cir.1980); Lee Pharmaceuticals v.

National Spinning Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Spinning Company, Inc., Intervenor

419 F.2d 391 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 18, 1969

419 F.2d 391 NATIONAL SPINNING COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Textile Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. TEXTILE WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. … The National Labor Relations Board petitioned for enforcement of its order as entered. 2 Upon consideration of the record as a whole, we are of opinion that the Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board of

Yousefi v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

260 F.3d 318 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 8, 2001

See INS v. Cardoza- Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 448 (1987). Thus, we give"due deference to the [Board's] interpretation of the deportation statute," Cabral v. … The Board looks to the elements of the crime rather than to the facts surrounding each crime. See Castle v. INS, 541 F.2d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1976) (per curiam).

Laurel Run Mining Co. v. Maynard

575 F. App'x 188 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 18, 2014

Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. … Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Laurel Run Mining Co. v. Maynard, Nos. 11-0817 BLA; 12-0032 BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 31, 2012).

Miller v. Cunningham

318 F. App'x 186 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 18, 2009

Miller v. Cunningham, 564 F.Supp.2d 555 (2008).

Eagles v. Harriss Sales Corp.

368 F.2d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 19, 1966

Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, supra, 263 F.2d 502, 505 , reheard 294 F.2d 619 ; Day v. Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, 242 N.C. 136 , 87 S.E.2d 18 (1955). … Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, supra, 263 F.2d 502 .

Darlene Ball-Rice v. Board of Education of PG County

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 21, 2013

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. … Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986); see Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (Fed.

William H. Carter v. Vernon L. Peppersack, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary

242 F.2d 750 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 1, 1957

See also Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 463-465 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 . As there is no certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , the appeal must be dismissed. Presley v. … Pepersack, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 325 ; Parker v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 4 Cir., 198 F.2d 72 ; Tyson v. Swenson, 4 Cir., 198 F.2d 308 ; Hanson v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 4 Cir., 198 F.2d 470 ; Hobbs v.

Huntington Alloys, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of America

623 F.2d 335 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 12, 1980

See Detroit Coil Co. v. I. A. M. Lodge 82, 594 F.2d 575, 581 (6 Cir. 1979). … There is a dictum to that effect in West Rock Lodge No. 2120, Machinists v.

Holderness v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

86 F.2d 137 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 9, 1936

It was held in Porter v. Commissioner, 288 U.S. 436, 53 . … Commissioner v. Chase National Bank (C.C.A.) 82 F.(2d) 157 , certiorari denied, 57 S.Ct. 15 , 81 L.Ed.-, October 12, 1936; 4 L.W. .25.

Anheuser-Busch Inc v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 1, 2003

 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,  Petitioner, v. … Busch next contends that the Representation Rule is inconsistent with Board precedent. See Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc. v.

Flota Maritima Browning De Cuba v. Motor Vessel Ciudad De La Habana

335 F.2d 619 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 14, 1964

It engaged the services of an American citizen, Browning, for the operation of Banco’s vessels, and, for that purpose, Browning organized a Cuban corporation, Flota Marítima Browning De Cuba, So-ciadad Anónima. … Flota Maritima Browning De Cuba, Sociadad Anonima v. The Ciudad De La Habana, D.C.D.Md., 181 F.Supp. 301 .

Morton v. Fahey

117 F. App'x 274 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 22, 2004

See Morton v. Fahey, No. CA-04-428-1 (E.D.Va. July 12, 2004).

West Penn Power Company and the Potomac Edison Company D/B/A Allegheny Power and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, Llc, a Single Employer, and Their Agent Allegheny Energy Service Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Utility Workers Union of America, Local 102, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board, Utility Workers Union of America, Local 102, Afl-Cio, Intervenor v. West Penn Power Company and the Potomac Edison Company D/B/A Allegheny Power and Allegheny Energy Supply Company, Llc, a Single Employer, and Their Agent Allegheny Energy Service Corporation

394 F.3d 233 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 12, 2005

National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, Utility Workers Union of America, Local 102, AFL-CIO, Intervenor, v. … NLRB v. Truitt Mfg.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. American Bank Trust Shares, Inc.

629 F.2d 951 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 14, 1980

The South Carolina statutes do not require notice of an adversary hearing before the Board of Bank Control or in the court, 5 nor does Fuentes v. … Cole v. Manning, 240 S.C. 260, 125 S.E.2d 621, 625 (1962); Jacoby v. South Carolina State Bd. of Nat. Exam., 219 S.C. 66 , 64 S.E.2d 138, 148-49 (1951); Feldman v.

Estate of Leavitt v. Commissioner

875 F.2d 420 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 19, 1989

See Brown v. Commissioner, 706 F.2d 755, 756 (6th Cir.1983), affg. T.C. … Brown, 706 F.2d at 757 . See also Raynor v.

United States v. Wrightson Samuel Tongue, Jr.

407 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 16, 1969

There was further correspondence between the defendant and Local Board No. 22 and in January the Board received a letter from defendant requesting a personal appearance before the Board and requesting a further delay because … Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); United States v. Jones, 382 F.2d 255 (4 Cir. 1967); United States v. Jackson, 369 F.2d 936, 938 (4 Cir. 1966); Blalock v.

Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 7, 2014

See, e.g., Boyle v. United Techs. Corp., 487 U.S. 500 (1988); Harris v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 724 F.3d 458 (3d Cir. 2013); Taylor v. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 658 F.3d 402 (4th Cir. 2011); Saleh v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009); Carmichael v.