Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.13s
Dayton Wright Airplane Co. v. Commissioner
17 B.T.A. 142 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 23, 1929
DAYTON WRIGHT AIRPLANE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Dayton Wright Airplane Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 16915. … such period during 1919 will also be determined under Rule 50 of the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished25 B.T.A. 537 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Feb 18, 1932
CAMP MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Camp Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 35955. … At the time of its dissolution the board of directors of said corporation consisted of six members.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGuaranty Trust Co. v. Commissioner
36 B.T.A. 597 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 5, 1937
S. 672; Schwab v. Schwab, 163 N. Y. S. 246; Schneider v. Schneider, 107 N. Y. S. 792, all relating to attempted gifts of bank deposits. In re Miller’s Estate, 236 N. Y. S. 290; 140 N. E. 701, 702 . … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSmith Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Commissioner
11 B.T.A. 902 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 30, 1928
SMITH AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Smith Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 13179. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 11 B.T.A. 902 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3699 ; April 30, 1928 , Promulgated *3699 Invested capital may not be reduced in determining the extent to which a dividend is paid from current earnings of
Cited 0 timesPublished31 B.T.A. 319 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 12, 1934
In this connection the petitioner cites the decision of the Board in Union C. De Ford, 19 B. T. … Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered for the respondent. Black, Smith, and Akundell dissent.
Cited 2 timesPublished36 B.T.A. 764 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 27, 1937
In Duffin v. … A. 518; Budd v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedClinton Hotel Realty Corp. v. Commissioner
44 B.T.A. 1215 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 8, 1941
A. 845; Renwick v. United States 87 Fed. (2d) 128; Commissioner v. Lyon, 97 Fed. (2d) 70; Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United States, 22 Fed. Supp. 119. … concluded that the payment was advance rental, and accordingly it is to be taxed to the petitioner in the year of its receipt. *1219 The petitioner places his entire reliance on an unpublished memorandum opinion of the Board
Cited 6 timesPublished15 B.T.A. 50 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 24, 1929
LORING, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. Loring v. Commissioner Docket No. 12069. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 15 B.T.A. 50 ; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2932 ; January 24, 1929 , Promulgated *2932 1. MOTION TO DISMISS denied. 2.
Cited 0 timesPublished32 B.T.A. 459 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Apr 18, 1935
Tait v. Western Maryland Rwy. Co., 289 U. S. 620 ; Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 ; Hanby v. Commissioner, 67 Fed. (2d) 125. … Reviewed by the Board. Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.
Cited 1 timesPublished9 B.T.A. 1209 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jan 12, 1928
The burden rests upon petitioners to establish in what year the losses occurred, and where they have not supplied this testimony, the Board is unable to supply it for them. Cf. Avery v. … Fell v. Commissioner, 7 B. T. A. 263, and that petitioners are, therefore, entitled to deduct their losses in this transaction in the year 1920. Respondent’s action in denying a deduction of any loss arising from the M.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
7 B.T.A. 817 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 29, 1927
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT DODGE, IOWA, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner Docket No. 8021. … United States Board of Tax Appeals 7 B.T.A. 817 ; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3098 ; July 29, 1927 , Promulgated *3098 Harry Friedman, Esq., and W. D. Jamieson, Esq., for the petitioner. L. C. Mitchell, Esq., for the respondent.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAmerican Viscose Corp. v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 937 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 13, 1930
AMERICAN VISCOSE CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. VISCOSE CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. VISCOSE CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA, PETITIONER, v. … American Viscose Corp. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 33953, 39112, 39113.
Cited 0 timesPublished46 B.T.A. 765 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Mar 27, 1942
See Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co., supra, page 185 of 247 U. S. 88 S. Ct. 467. … Our conclusion here also seems to be in accord with the recent case of Glenn v. Louisville Trust Co., 124 Fed. (2d) 48.
Reversed by Harwick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 133 F.2d 732 (1943)Cited 13 timesPublishedNew York Theatre Program Corp. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 431 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 27, 1926
New York Theatre Program Corp. v. Commissioner Docket No. 4357. … V. Storrs 1,965 shares Ralph Trier 750 shares R. M.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFederal Holding Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 1144 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · May 20, 1925
Federal Holding Co. v. Commissioner Docket No. 2003. United States Board of Tax Appeals 1 B.T.A. 1144 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2640 ; May 20, 1925 , decided Submitted April 7, 1925 . *2640 Arthur L. … These respective depreciation rates are the sole issue before the Board, other than minor adjustments in the invested capital. DECISION.
Cited 0 timesPublished3 B.T.A. 113 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Nov 24, 1925
Haas Bros. v. Commissioner Docket No. 1675. … In Hamilton v. Klinke, 42 Cal.App. 426 , 183 Pac. 675 , and in Jones v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIndiana Lamp Corp. v. Commissioner
28 B.T.A. 491 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jun 22, 1933
In Kirby Lumber Co. v. United States, 284 U.S. 1 , the Supreme Court held that a corporation may realize profit from a transaction in its own bonds. … Wool-ford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U.S. 319 . Reviewed by the Board. Decision will be entered wider Rule 50. Smith and Murdock dissent.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 B.T.A. 1116 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Oct 16, 1936
In the case of Labrot v. Burnet, 57 Fed. (2d) 413, affirming the Board, 18 B. T. … With that reasoning of the Board of Tax Appeals we agree. In transactions like the one before us, substance and not form determines the applicability of the taxing act. Southern Pacific Co. v. Lowe, 247 U.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 B.T.A. 537 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Aug 11, 1930
McGuire v. McGuire, supra; Baumann v. Mina mon, 132 Misc. 891 ; 230 N. Y. S. 723; Stanley v. Payne, 119 N. Y. S. 570; Bryant v. Shaw, 180 N. Y. S. 301; Hutchens v. Van Vechten, supra; Wendt v. … Walsh, supra; Poppenhausen v. Poppenhausen, 149 App. Div. (N. Y.) 307; Woerz v. Rademacher, supra; Ramson v. Lampman, 5 N. Y. 456 ; Holden v. Burton, 105 N. Y. 415 ; 11 N.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 B.T.A. 290 · United States Board of Tax Appeals · Jul 10, 1925
Meredith v. Commissioner Docket No. 1540. United States Board of Tax Appeals 2 B.T.A. 290 ; 1925 BTA LEXIS 2471 ; July 10, 1925 , Decided Submitted June 10, 1925 . *2471 George Maurice Morris, Esq., for the taxpayer. … From the allegations of the petition admitted *2472 by the Commissioner, certain depositions offered in evidence, and the stipulations of the parties, the Board makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT. 1.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna