Opinion

Smith Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Commissioner

  • 11 B.T.A. 902
  • 1928 BTA LEXIS 3699
Court
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Filed
Apr 30, 1928
Status
Published
On the bench
Trammell
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 14.4%

The opinion

SMITH AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Smith Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 13179.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

11 B.T.A. 902 ; 1928 BTA LEXIS 3699 ;

April 30, 1928 , Promulgated

*3699 Invested capital may not be reduced in determining the extent to which a dividend is paid from current earnings of a year by a "tentative tax" theoretically set aside out of earnings pro rata over such year.

H. A. Mihills, Esq., for the petitioner.

Frank S. Easby-Smith, Esq., for the respondent.

TRAMMELL

*902 This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income and profits taxes for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1920, in the amount of $4,081.53.

The error alleged is that the respondent "has reduced taxpayer's invested capital in determining the extent to which a dividend is paid from current earnings by a tentative tax theoretically set aside out of earnings pro rata over the year."

FINDINGS OF FACT.

The petitioner is an Ohio corporation with its principal office at Columbus.

On January 2, 1920, the petitioner declared a dividend of $91,400 which was payable and was paid on January 6, 1920. On the latter date the taxable income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1920, prorated for the period to January 6, 1920, was $73,509.22. The respondent in computing the invested capital for the fiscal year involved, *3700 assumed an obligation to pay income and profits taxes for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1920, amounting to $127,762.52, which sum when prorated to the period to January 6, 1920, resulted in reducing the amount of income available for dividends in the amount of $23,240.01.

The books of account of the petitioner during the taxable years involved were kept upon the accrual basis.

OPINION.

TRAMMELL: The question here involved is governed by previous decisions of the Board and upon authority of those decisions it is held that the invested capital of the petitioner should not be reduced in determining the extent to which a dividend is paid from current carnings of the year by a "tentative tax" theoretically set aside out of earnings pro rata over the year. ; ; ; ; *3701 ; *903 ; All .

Ordered that judgment pursuant to the findings of fact and opinion be rendered under Rule 50.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.