Case law

Hardin v. Hight

106 Ark. 190 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1913

Anderson v. Cowles, 72 Conn. 335 , 77 Am. St. Rep. 310 ; Cary v. Sheets, 67 Ind. 375 ; Sprangler v. Booze, 103 Va. 276 ; 49 S. E. 42 ; Elsee v. Smith, 2 Chitty, 304, 18 E. C. L. 648, 1 D. & E. 97; Miller v. … Brown, 3 Mo. 96 .

Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.

194 Ark. 925 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 1, 1937

Power & Light Co., who became the assignee of the contract between said Consumers Ice & Light Co., and the Board of Commissioners of the district acquired no rights by virtue of the assignment which might be enforced in … In the case of Shorman v. Eakin, 47 Ark. 351 , 1 S. W. 559 , Mr. Justice Battle said in writing- the opinion: “No one, as a rule, can estop himself from taking advantage of that which is contrary to public policy.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Bagley & Co.

178 Ark. 876 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 14, 1929

It was merely sold on the board. After they would sell this on the board, then, when the actual cotton was sold, he would take up his hedge. … Kirkpatrick v. Bonsall, 72 Penn. 155 .

Hogg v. Laster

56 Ark. 382 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1892

She replied, denying that he told her he could not pay her wages, and denying that she owed him for board, clothing and medical attention. … Guild v. Guild, 15 Pick. 131 ; Tyler v. Burrington, 39 Wis. 376 ; Pritchard v. Pritchard, 69 Wis. 373 .

Babb v. El Dorado

170 Ark. 10 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1926

Co. v. McElroy, 92 Ark. 600 ; Carpenter v. Little Rock, 101 Ark. 238 ; Eubanks v. Futrell, 112 Ark. 437 . … This court decided in Kirk v.

Efurd v. State

352 Ark. 476 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 2003

Hayes v. State, 328 Ark. 95 , 940 S.W.2d 886 (1997). Here, Atkinson did not act with diligence and thus waived the right to appeal from the order. … Brown and Hannah, JJ., dissent.

Stout v. Stinnett

210 Ark. 684 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1946

Having tbis authority, tbe board adopted an ordinance creating tbe office of building inspector, and defining tbe powers and duties of its incumbent. … The right to create pne office does not imply the right to create two. . . . ” The case of State v. Martin, 60 Ark. 343 , 30 S. W. 431 , 28 L. R.

Smith v. Improvement District No. 14

108 Ark. 141 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 28, 1913

In Lenow v. … Board of Improvement District No. 3, Texarkana, 69 Ark. 86 , where the court held that a tenant for life is not an owner who may sign a petition for the formation of an improvement district. In the case of Rector v.

Lewis v. Rieff

114 Ark. 366 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1914

In Board Imp. Sewer District v. … Fitzgerald v. Walker, 55 Ark. 157 .

Firemen's Insurance Co. v. Little

189 Ark. 640 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 24, 1934

Their testimony was substantially the same as that of Brown. F. J. W. … Ringlehaupt v. Young, 55 Ark. 128 , 17 S. W. 710 ; Transportation Line v. Hope, 95 U. S. 297 ; Bedell v. Long Island Rd. Co., 44 N. Y. 367 ; Fort v. State, 52 Ark. 180 , 11 S. W. 959 ; Miller v.

Democrat Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Parker

192 Ark. 989 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1936

No. 74 v. Refunding Board of Arkansas, ante p. 892, 95 S. W. (2d) 639 ; Refunding Board of Arkansas v. National Refining Co., 191 Ark. 1080 , 89 S. W. (2d) 917 . … This is discretion by all definitions known to the law. and is especially so under our recent opinions in the Befunding Board cases cited, supra. Cotham v.

New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Reding

65 Ark. 489 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1898

Holiman v. Hance, 61 Ark. 119 ; Vaughan v. Norwood, 44 ib. 101; Harris v. Mills, 28 Ill. 44 , S. C. 81 Am. Dec. 259 ; Brown v. Cascaden, 43 Iowa, 103 ; 2 Jones, Mortg. §§ 1207, 1225. … Co. v. Milam, 64 Ark. 305 , is not in conflict with our conclusion here. In that case the plaintiff alleged that the mortgage was executed to secure a promissory note.

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Harris

322 Ark. 465 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 20, 1995

Silvey Cos. v. Riley, 318 Ark. 788 , 888 S.W.2d 636 (1994). … Johnson v. Lilly, 308 Ark. 201 , 823 S.W.2d 883 (1992). Affirmed. Glaze, J., concurs and Brown, J., dissents.

Hubbert v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

136 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1918

Franklin, 75 Ark. 571 ; Merritt v. Wallace, 76 Ark. 217 ; Beavers v. Security Mutual Ins. Co., 76 Ark. 138 ; St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Boyles, 78 Ark. 374 ; Houghton v. Mosley, 80 Ark. 259 ; Van Patten v. … Wank, 82 Ark. 547 ; Wallace v. St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 83 Ark. 356 ; Baker v. Cazort, 87 Ark. 368 ; Brown v. Hardy, 95 Ark. 123 ; DeQueen & Eastern Ry. Co. v. Thornton, 98 Ark. 61 .

Young v. Linwood School District No. 17

193 Ark. 82 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1936

a resolution adopted by the board of directors on September 26, 1935. … A like subject has been under consideration by the Arizona Supreme Court in the case of Alexander v. Phillips, 31 Ariz. 503 , 254 Pac. 1056 , 52 A. L. R. 244.

Albersen v. Klanke

177 Ark. 288 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1928

Mason v. Gates, 90 Ark. 241 , 119 S. W. 70 ; and Baldwin v. Brown, 166 Ark. 1 , 265 S. W. 976 .

Collins v. Underwood

33 Ark. 265 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1878

Her board and tuition not being paid, Dr. Collins wrote several times to her father asking payment, who replied giving excuses and promising payment. … It was held in the case'of Stillwell and wife v.

Beulah v. State

352 Ark. 472 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 2003

Payne v. State, 327 Ark. 25, 28 , 937 S.W.2d 160, 161 (1997). … Affirmed. *805 BROWN, J., dissents. CORBIN, J., not participating. ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. I disagree with the majority's analysis in this case.

Leonard v. Aviation Credit Corporation

207 Ark. 465 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1944

Citizens’ Union Nat’l Bank v. Thweatt, 166 Ark. 269 , 265 S. W. 955 . In Jones v. Green, 173 Ark. 846 , 293 S. … Jones v. Green, supra.

Weaver-Dowdy Co. v. Martin

94 Ark. 503 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1910

Floyd v. Ricks, 14 Ark. 286, 294 ; Brown v. Hanauer, 48 Ark. 277 ; Storthz v. Chapline, 71 Ark. 31 ; Seawell v. Young, 77 Ark. 309 . The conveyance of Thomas to Dobson was an absolute deed. … Martin v. Schichtl, 60 Ark. 595 ; Fort Smith Milling Co. v. Mikles, 61 Ark. 123 . Decree affirmed so far as it effects the rights of the plaintiffs.