Case law

Pratt v. Dudley

73 Ark. 536 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 14, 1905

Broughton v. Pensacola, 93 U. S. 266, 270 ; O’Connor v. Memphis, 6 Lea, 735 , 736. See also, 8 Rose’s Notes, U. S. Rep., 955, for cases cited. … Forbes v. Board of Health, 9 So. 447 , 27 Fla. 194 ; Wright v. Oakley, 5 Met. 400 ; Steamship Co. v. Joliffe, 2 Wall. 450 ; Sutherland, Stat. Const. § 134; Endlich, Int.

Jackson v. State

54 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1891

In Thompson v. … Dig., sec. 2146; Giboney v. Rogers, 32 Ark., 462).

Springdale School District v. Jameson

274 Ark. 78 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 1981

Richards v. Maner, Judge, 219 Ark. 112 , 240 S.W. 2d 6 (1951). Jurisdiction is tested on the pleadings and not the proof. Modern Laundry v. Dilley, 111 Ark. 350 , 163 S.W. 1197 (1914). … Maddox, et al v. Neal, et al, 45 Ark. 121 (1885). A mandamus action against a school board is cognizable in circuit court and not in chancery court. Nethercutt v.

Merchants & Farmers Bank v. Harris Lumber Co.

103 Ark. 283 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 22, 1912

Wolfe v. Irwin & Ward Co., 71 Ark. 438 ; Stiewel v. Webb Press Co., 79 Ark. 45 ; 10 Cyc. 1001. … In the case of Estes v.

Wheeler v. City of Arkadelphia

254 Ark. 533 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1973

Brown v. Curtis, Clerk, 254 Ark. 162 , 492 S.W. 2d 235 (1973). … As we understand the record as abstracted this issue was not presented to the court and is not properly before us as we held in Brown v. Curtis, Clerk, supra.

Ryan v. State

260 Ark. 270 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 19, 1976

First, he argues that the state failed to connect the brown sack found in the ditch with appellant, “and this brown sack could be anyone’s sack”; second, that one of the “baggies” containing marijuana was not labeled as having … Randle and Wright v. State, 245 Ark. 653 , 434 S.W. 2d 294 ; Stout v. State, 249 Ark. 25 , 458 S.W. 2d 42 .

Rowdean v. State

280 Ark. 146 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 11, 1983

The State then called Clifton Earl Brown to testify that she had pulled a knife on him at The Godfather. The court refused to allow the evidence for impeachment purposes, and was correct in that regard. See Rhodes v. … The State did not notify the defense it intended to call Clifton Earl Brown, and, undoubtedly, it made plans to do so. This was also error according to Williams v.

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of El Dorado v. Union Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n

257 Ark. 199 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1974

The appellant recognizes our rule that in this type case we affirm the Board’s action if there is any substantial evidence to support its findings. Morrilton Fed. S&L v. … We said that the specific findings by the Board were for the benefit of the reviewing courts. In Ark. S&L Bd. v. Grant Cty. S&L, supra, the issue was not presented and we affirmed.

Contractors v. Jones

218 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1951

The Board then appealed to this Court. Section 71-701 Ark. … The powers of the Board should not be exercised in a capricious, unreasonable or arbitrary manner. Carville v. Smith, 211 Ark. 491 , 201 S. W. 2d 33 . The judgment of the Pulaski Circuit Court is affirmed.

First National Bank v. J. H. Snyder Manufacturing Co.

175 Ark. 1134 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 23, 1928

Bank of Corning v. Nimnich, 122 Ark. 316 , 182 S. W. 756 , Ann. Cas. 1917D 566. In that case the first signature to the note was “Farmers’ Union Gin & W. H. Co., per Henry Brown, Sec. and Treas.” … Lawrence County Bank v. Arndt, 69 Ark. 406 , 65 S. W. 1052 .

Mutual Aid Union v. Perdue

162 Ark. 551 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 18, 1924

See also Hogan v. Pacific Endowment League, 99 Cal. 248 ; Tobin v. Western Mutual Aid Society, 72 Iowa 261 ; Underwood v. Iowa Legion of Honor, 66 Iowa 134 , 23 N. W. 300 ; Baker v. Citizens’ Mut. Fire Ins. … W. 391 ; Bates v. Detroit Mut. Ben. Assn., 51 Mich. 587 , 17 N. W. 67 .

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Standridge

207 Ark. 959 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 27, 1944

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Compton, 114 Ark. 193 , 169 S. W. 946 . Following affirmance, and before the judgment became final, the Supreme Court of the United States decided against Brown in the South Carolina case. … Standridge. 2 This section of the Digest erroneously shows the Act to have been passed in 1913. 3 Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 234 U. S. 542 , 34 S. Ct. 955 , 58 L. Ed. 1457 .

Batesville White Lime Company v. Bell

212 Ark. 23 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 13, 1947

In the case of Frankamp v. Fordney Hotel et al., 222 Mich. 525 , 193 N. … The Supreme Court of Colorado, in the case of Carroll v.

McConnell v. Arkansas Brick & Manufacturing Co.

70 Ark. 568 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 17, 1902

Co. v. … In Files v.

Edwards v. Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Div. Bd.

307 Ark. 245 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1991

Our review is similarly limited, and we review the decision of the Board, not that of the circuit court. See Singleton v. Smith, 289 Ark. 577 , 715 S.W.2d 437 (1986); Green House, Inc. v. … Green v. Carder, 282 Ark. 239 , 667 S.W.2d 660 (1984). As the circuit court noted, the “crux” of Mr.

Blake v. Shellstrom

424 S.W.3d 830 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 2012

Attached to the motion were the affidavits of Keith Huyard and Rebecca Brown, who served as- foreperson and juror respectively in appellant’s trial. Brown’s January 19, 2011 affidavit reads as follows. … See Garrett v. Brown, 319 Ark. 662, 666-67 , 893 S.W.2d 784, 787 (1995) (citing Kempner v. Schulte, 318 Ark. 433 , 885 S.W.2d 892 (1994)).

Adams v. Woodfin

243 Ark. 348 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1967

Lyle Brown, Justice. … Of the same accord are such cases and authorities as Makariw v. Rinard, 336 F. 2d 333 (1964); Dave Rice v. Ringsby Truck Lines et al, 302 F. 2d 550 (1962); Brown v. Wheeling & L. E. R. Co., 65 N.

Jonathan Brizendine and Melissa Brizendine v. Department of Human Services of the State of Arkansas; The Child Welfare Agency Review Board; Avery Carter, in His Official Capacity as Program Administrator for Division of Children and Family Services; And Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders

2025 Ark. 34 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 2025

I agree with the majority’s disposition; however, I write separately for the reasons stated in my dissent in Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas v. … Auth. v. Wiley, 2020 1 Thurston v.

Parker v. Ramada Inn

264 Ark. 472 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1978

See Watts v. Employment Security Agency, 80 Idaho 529 , 335 P. 2d 533 (1959), involving a log scaler and Powell v. Com., Unemployment Comp. Bd., 31 Pa. Comwlth. 512, 377 A. 2d 206 (1977), involving a security guard. … As noted in the recent case of Harris v.

Kreutzer v. Clark

271 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 24, 1980

Spitzer v. Barnhill, 237 Ark. 525 , 374 S.W. 2d 811 (1964), Ark. R. Civ. P. 52. … State Police Commission v. Davidson, 252 Ark. 137 , 477 S.W. 2d 852 (1972).