Case law

Jeffers v. Clinton

776 F. Supp. 465 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 24, 1991

Rose Confections, Inc. v. Ambrosia Chocolate Co., 816 F.2d 381, 396 (8th Cir.1987); Craik v. Minnesota State University Board, 738 F.2d 348, 349-50 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam). … Pennsylvania v.

Sherpell v. Humnoke School District No. 5

750 F. Supp. 971 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 17, 1990

Patterson v. … See also James v.

Perry v. Norris

879 F. Supp. 1503 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 3, 1995

Field then made the following request of the Parole Board: Although Cindy Brown I am certain makes a good appearance in person, I would hope the Parole Board would take into consider *1575 ation the string of violent crimes … Crockett & Brown, P.A. v.

Tarasenko v. University of Arkansas

63 F. Supp. 3d 910 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 23, 2014

Browning v. President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc., 139 F.3d 631, 635 (8th Cir.1998) (quoting Price Waterhouse v. … Brown v. Ark. State Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Licensing Bd., 336 Ark. 34, 38 , 984 S.W.2d 402, 403-04 (1999).

Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 28, 2025

Wyoming v. Oklahoma, 502 U.S. 437, 453 (1992); Hampton Feedlot, Inc. v. Nixon, 249 F.3d 814, 818 (8th Cir. 2001). … Indeed, “[s]ubjecting [TRICARE] to the Arkansas [Act 624] license requirements would give the State’s [pharmacy] board a virtual power of review over the federal determination of [who the Department of Defense can contract

Jeffers v. Clinton

762 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 18, 1991

Corley v. Daunhauer

312 F. Supp. 811 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 8, 1970

Tinker v. … Brown, N.D.Ala., 299 F.Supp. 1360 . See also Leonard v. School Committee of Attleboro, 349 Mass. 704 , 212 N.E.2d 468 , 14 A.L.R.2d 1192 , and Annotation beginning at Page 1201.

Miller v. Arkansas State University Board of Trustees

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Dec 26, 2023

CASE NO. 2:22-CV-00115-BSM ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al. … See Main v.

Shamburger v. Moody

322 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 27, 1970

Plaintiffs Claim Against Empire In the recent case of National Surety Corporation v. … See the discussion of “and/or” appearing in Mellinkoff, The Language of the Law, Little, Brown & Co., pp. 147-152 and 307-310.

Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. PULASKI CTY. SPEC. SCH.

237 F. Supp. 2d 988 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 11, 2002

In 1954, the Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Brown v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 301 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955) (" Brown II "). [17] Faubus, of course, cited public safety concerns as his reason for mobilizing the National Guard.

Brown

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 24, 2026

Brown’s subsequent drug test is irrelevant in the analysis because at the time the Agency made its decision to terminate Brown, it was unaware of the subsequent test. Taylor v. Union Pac. … The Agency has offered a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for Brown’s termination and Brown has offered no evidence demonstrating pretext. Wilking v.

Young v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

309 F. Supp. 475 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 30, 1969

Lincoln Mills, 353 U.S. 448 , 77 S.Ct. 912 , 1 L.Ed.2d 972 ; Brown v. Sterling Aluminum Products Co., 8 Cir., 365 F.2d 651 . … United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574 , 80 S.Ct. 1347 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 ; J. I. Case Co. v. N.L.R.B., 321 U.S. 332 , 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Henry v. Department of the Navy

755 F. Supp. 1442 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Feb 5, 1991

See Lewis v. … See Board of Education, City of Cincinnati v. Department of H.E.W., 655 F.Supp. 1504, 1547 (S.D.Ohio 1986).

Brown

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 2, 2026

In fact, in making this decision, the question is not whether Brown actually had probable cause, but only whether he arguably had probable cause. Galanakis v. … Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54, 60 (2014). For all of these reasons, Brown did not violate Nelson’s clearly established rights.

Gilbreath v. EAST ARK. PLANNING & DEVEL. DIST.

471 F. Supp. 912 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 24, 1979

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). 12. "To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it. … Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Board of Regents v. Roth, supra ; Bishop v. Woods, supra ; Mazaleski v.

Conway School District v. Wilhoit

854 F. Supp. 1430 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 13, 1994

The Supreme Court in Raney declared unconstitutional any “freedom of choice” plan that *1435 was a subterfuge for evading Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … CONCLUSION The Court finds that plaintiff lacks standing to bring this lawsuit pursuant to Allen v. Board of Elections, Roberts v. Wamser and the other case law cited above.

McArthur v. Robinson

98 F.R.D. 672 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 22, 1983

U.S. v. Stanford, 589 F.2d 285 (7th Cir.1978). … Dos Santos v. O’Neill, 62 F.R.D. 448 (E.D.Pa.1974), quoting Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D.Pa.1973).

Eckstein v. Kirby

452 F. Supp. 1235 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 9, 1978

Carter v. Jury Comm’n, supra, as did Brown v. Allen, supra; Rawlins v. Georgia, supra; and other cases, recoge nized a broad discretion in the States in this respect. … Virginia Board of Education, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966), and the right to travel interstate, Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969). In the case of Adams v.

Lendall v. Jernigan

424 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 5, 1977

Jenness v. Fortson, supra; cf. Storer v. Brown, supra. … Storer v. Brown and Jenness v. Fortson, both supra.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rock Tenn Co.

774 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 31, 2011

See Lindsey v. Cube Corp., 386 F.Supp.2d 1037, 1040-41 (W.D.Ark.2005); LeGrand v. Area Resources for Community and Human Services, 394 F.3d 1098 (8th Cir.2005); Tuggle v. Mangan, 348 F.3d 714 (8th Cir.2003); Duncan v. … Cruz v.