Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,597 results
1.23s
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 20, 2026
Brown Decl. (Doc. 43-23) at 17-19. … Brown v. Am. Honda Motor Co., 939 F.2d 946, 952 (11th Cir. 1991).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 7, 2023
See, e.g, Ellard v. … Without a liberty interest in parole, the Parole Board’s procedures are not required “to comport with standards of fundamental fairness.” See Slocum v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTwin City Fire Ins. v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins.
124 F. Supp. 2d 1243 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 7, 2000
See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). … See Brown Mach. Works & Supply, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 951 F.Supp. 988, 992 (M.D.Ala. 1996).
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 15, 2023
Brown v. Hughes, 894 F.2d 1533, 1537 (11th Cir. 1990). … (Id.: “Due to your negative behavior, the Board recommends a custody increase to Medium SL V and you transfer to any SL V facility … .”).
Cited 0 timesUnknown222 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 26, 1963
Thus this plenary hearing, because of the State’s failure to make such inquiry, was required by Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 , Thomas v. … Johnson v. Zerbst, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJurriaans v. Alabama Cooperative Extension System
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 26, 2019
Jurriaans gave Brown a written rebuttal to the evaluation (see Doc. # 79-3, at 149–50), and Brown agreed to attach that rebuttal to the evaluation (Doc. # 79-5, at 14–15). … Dist. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown970 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 4, 1996
Arnold v. Board of Educ. of Escambia County, Alabama, 880 F.2d 305 (11th Cir.1989). The court may consider circumstantial evidence in determining whether these elements have been met. See Burrell v. … Eldridge appealed his termination to the Personnel Board which subsequently reinstated him. 7 .
Cited 7 timesPublished336 F. Supp. 924 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 3, 1972
See, e. g., Howard v. Adams County Board of Supervisors, 453 F.2d 455 (1971); Hall v. Issaquena County Board of Supervisors, 453 F.2d 404 (1971); Chavis v. Whitcomb, supra; Mann v. … Davis, 238 F.Supp. 458 (E.D.Va.1964), aff’d, 379 U.S. 694 , 85 S.Ct. 713 , 13 L.Ed.2d 698 (1965); Reynolds v. State Election Board, 233 F.Supp. 323 (W.D.Okl.1964); Moss v.
Cited 46 timesPublishedNational Railroad Passenger Corp. v. H & P, Inc.
949 F. Supp. 1556 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Nov 5, 1996
Patel, P.E., who is Amtrak’s representative in working with the National Transportation Safety Board regarding event recorders. … Pryor v. Brown & Root USA, Inc., 674 So.2d 45, 48 (Ala.1995) (internal citations and quotations omitted).
Cited 10 timesPublishedMoncrief v. City of Montgomery (CONSENT)
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 25, 2025
Finley, Jr., James Albrecht, and Christopher Brown. (Doc. No. 1.) … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 4, 2021
Id.; Brown v. Sullivan, 921 F.2d 1233, 1236 (11th Cir. 1991) (quoting MacGregor, 786 F.2d at 1053). II. … See Brown-Gaudet-Evans v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 673 F. App’x 902, 904 (11th Cir. 2016) (emphasis added) (citing Rodriguez v. Schweiker, 640 F.2d 682, 686 (5th Cir. 1981)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownForte v. The City of Montgomery
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 27, 2019
Webster v. Byrd, 494 So. 2d 31, 34 (Ala. 1986). … Webster v. Byrd, 494 So. 2d 31, 34 (Ala. 1986).
Cited 0 timesUnknown250 F. Supp. 117 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 18, 1966
State of Georgia, 350 U.S. 85 , 76 S.Ct. 167 , 100 L.Ed. 77 ; Hernandez v. State of Texas, 347 U.S. 475 , 74 S.Ct. 667 , 98 L.Ed. 866 ; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; United States ex rel. … Seals v. Wiman, 5 Cir., 304 F.2d 53 ; United States ex rel. Goldsby v.
Cited 34 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · May 8, 2020
Code §16-8-23 (“a county board of education appoints, upon recommendation of the superintendent, all principals, teachers, clerical, and professional assistants.”). In Board of Sch. Comm'rs of Mobile Cty. v. … See., e.g., Turner v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGAYFER MONTGOMERY FAIR CO. v. Austin
222 F. Supp. 2d 1292 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 24, 2002
See Friedman’s, Inc. v. Dunlap, 290 F.3d 191 (4th Cir.2002); Brown & Root, Inc. v. Breckenridge, 211 F.3d 194 (4th Cir.2000); Circuit City Stores v. McLemore, No. … See Razatos v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDixon v. National Security of Alabama Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 8, 2020
Code §16-8-23 (“a county board of education appoints, upon recommendation of the superintendent, all principals, teachers, clerical, and professional assistants.”). In Board of Sch. Comm'rs of Mobile Cty. v. … See., e.g., Turner v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHorne v. Russell County Commission
379 F. Supp. 2d 1305 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 15, 2005
See Board of County Comm’rs, Fremont County, Colo. v. E.E.O.C., 405 F.3d 840, 842 (10th Cir.2005). Also, in Carlton v. City of Topeka, Kansas, No. 91-2273-JWL, 1993 WL 32780 (D.Kan. … See Carter v. Calhoun County Board of Education, 345 So.2d 1351 (Ala.1977). In opposing a Motion for Summary Judgment, however, Horne must go beyond mere allegation.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJones v. Hamm (INMATE 2) (MEMBER)
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 2023
The Defendants cite Klinger v. Dep’t of Corr., 31 F.3d 727, 731 (8th Cir. 1994), and an unpublished opinion, Smith v. Brown, No. 1:12-CV-328-TWT (N.D. Ga. … See, e.g., Sassman v. Brown, 73 F. Supp. 3d 1241, 1249-50 (E.D. Cal. 2014) (distinguishing Klinger because it focused on the differences between prison structures and not on the prisoners themselves).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDixon v. Hamm (INMATE 2) (LEAD) (MAG+)
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 2023
The Defendants cite Klinger v. Dep’t of Corr., 31 F.3d 727, 731 (8th Cir. 1994), and an unpublished opinion, Smith v. Brown, No. 1:12-CV-328-TWT (N.D. Ga. … See, e.g., Sassman v. Brown, 73 F. Supp. 3d 1241, 1249-50 (E.D. Cal. 2014) (distinguishing Klinger because it focused on the differences between prison structures and not on the prisoners themselves).
Cited 0 timesUnknownPodolski v. United States of America Department of Defense
District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 29, 2022
[Board],” but may “only require the [Board], on remand, to explain 6. … court); Manker v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna