Case law

Kersh v. State

228 Ala. 364 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 18, 1934

Petition of Glenn Kersh, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Kersh v. State ( 6 Div. 318 ) 153 So. 284 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Mills v. Grogan

175 Ala. 247 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1911

Brown and Herring *258 and Sanders did all the talking to me all the time. I did not request Capt. Humes to assist in the prosecution of that case. Mr. Brown told me that they were going to have Capt. Humes assist. … Ev., 459; McLeod v. McLeod, 73 Ala. 42 . See former report of this case, 167 Ala. 146 , 52 South. 596 -599.

Levesque v. Regional Medical Center Bd.

612 So. 2d 445 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1993

Code 1975, § 6-5-484 ; Hannon v. Duncan , 594 So.2d 85 (Ala. 1992); Bradford v. McGee , 534 So.2d 1076 (Ala. 1988). Ordinarily, the plaintiff is required to prove these elements through expert testimony. Dobbs v. … Cook v. Cook , 396 So.2d 1037 (Ala. 1981). Dr.

Smith v. City of Mobile

374 So. 2d 305 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 31, 1979

Pieper v. Planning Board of Southborough , 340 Mass. 157 , 163 N.E.2d 14 , 18 (1959). Similarly in Baltimore Planning Com'n v. Victor Development Co. , supra 275 A.2d at 482, it was noted that ". . . … (Emphasis Added) Castle Estates, Inc. v. Park Planning Board of Medfield , 344 Mass. 329 , 182 N.E.2d 540 , 545 , 545 (1962).

Matson v. State

234 Ala. 74 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 8, 1937

Petition of Curtis Matson for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Matson v. State, 27 Ala.App. 396 , 173 So. 612 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. … 'J., and THOMAS, BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Donley v. Camp

22 Ala. 659 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1853

Brewster, 2 McLean 21 ; Foote v. Brown, ib. 369; Green v. … Rightmere, 20 John. 366 ; Brown v. Curtis, 2 Conn. 225 ; Union Bank v. Carter, 3 Cow. 208 ; Luqueer v. Prosser, 1 Hill 256 ; and the the current of American authorities is in support of the New York rule. Thrasher v.

Dunn v. Ponceler

235 Ala. 280 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 16, 1937

Lee et al. v. City of Birmingham, 221 Ala. 419 , 128 So. 902 ; Greenwood et al. v. State ex rel. Bailes, Solicitor., 229 Ala. 630 , 159 So. 91 , and Malone et al. v. Kellett, 229 Ala. 648 , 159 So. 95 . … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Smith v. Smith

153 Ala. 504 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 19, 1907

.” — Earling v. Charleston, 51 Ala. 166 ; Martin v. Martin, 123 Ala. 191 , 26 *509 South. 525 ; West v. Hendrix, 28 Ala. 226 ; Peeples v. Stolla, 57 Ala. 58 . … —Swift v. Swift, 36 Ala. 137 ; Worley v. Dryden, 57 Mo. 226 -231. As was said in Peeples v.

Gant v. McCarty

242 Ala. 350 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1942

BROWN, Justice. Neither the order of the circuit court, sitting in equity, overruling the motion to strike, nor the order overruling the demurrer to the petition of Blanche K. … Ashurst et al. v. Ashurst, 175 Ala. 667 , 57 So. 442 . Appeal dismissed; mandamus denied. GARDNER, C. J., THOMAS, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Bland

441 So. 2d 122 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 23, 1983

DECISION In Williams v. … Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519 , 92 S.Ct. 594 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972); Wilwording v. Swenson , 404 U.S. 249 , 92 S.Ct. 407 , 30 L.Ed.2d 418 (1971); Screws v.

Clark v. Hart

49 Ala. 86 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1873

Barringer & Rhodes v. Sneed, 3 Stewart, 201 ; Brooks & Brown v. Maltby, 3 S. & P. 96 ; Litchfield v. Falconer, 2 Ala. 280 ; Cowles v. Townsend & Millikin, 31 Ala. 133 .

Alford v. Eubank

44 Ala. 276 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1870

Code, §§ 2247, 2250; Bartee and Wife v. James, 33 Ala. 34 . … This court has repeatedly decided that this must affirmatively appear from the record to have been done, or it will be rejected.— Union India Rubber Co. v. Mitchell, 37 Ala. 314 ; Haden v. Brown, 22 Ala. 572 .

Coleman v. Butt

130 Ala. 266 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1900

—Brown’s Admr s. v. Mize, 119 Ala. 10 ; Seals v. Robinson & Co., 75 Ala. 368 ; Bell, Admr., v. Montgomery Light Co., 103 Ala. 275 . … —Lide v. Hadley, 36 Ala. 627 ; S. & N. A. R. R. Co. v. Highland . Ave. & B. R. R. Co., 98 Ala. 407 .

Phillips v. Atkins

229 Ala. 15 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 4, 1934

Section 6755, subsec. 22, of the Code ’of 1923; Acts 1927, p. 392, § 161; Commissioners’ Court of Calhoun County v. City of Anniston, 176 Ala. 605 , 58 So. 252 ; Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. State ex rel. … City of Mobile v. Board of R. & R. Com’rs Mobile County, 180 Ala. 489 , 61 So. 368 .

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Higginbotham

232 Ala. 235 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 19, 1936

*236 BROWN, Justice. The several counts of the complaint on which the case was submitted to the jury are in case. … Southern Railway Co. v. Hanby, 166 Ala. 641 , 52 So. 334 .

Logan v. Buettner

342 So. 2d 352 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 21, 1977

Chambers appealed and this court affirmed the trial court in Chambers v. Buettner , 295 Ala. 8 , 321 So.2d 650 (1975). … Louisville Nashville Railroad Co. v. Johns , 267 Ala. 261 , 101 So.2d 265 (1958).

Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. Parmer

742 So. 2d 159 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 9, 1999

Edwarts Sons, Inc. v. Clark , 558 So.2d 358 , 362 (Ala. 1990) ("Arbitration is matter of contract, and a party cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute that he has not agreed to submit."). AFFIRMED. … J., and Maddox, Houston, Cook, Lyons, Brown, and Johnstone, JJ., concur.

Melvin v. Scowley

213 Ala. 414 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 28, 1925

The subject was again considered by that able jurist in Brown v. … And the rule applied in Hall v. Pearce, 209 Ala. 397, 399 , 96 So. 608 , and Mann Lbr. Co. v. Bailey Iron Works, 156 Ala. 598, 603 , 47 So. 325 . That is to say. the distinction observed in Brown v.

Gibson v. Goldthwaite

7 Ala. 281 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1845

To the same effect are Morgan, et al. v. Marsack and another, 2 Mer. Rep. 107; Angell v. Hadden, 15 Ves. Rep. 244. True, in Barclay v. … In Crawshay v.

Evans v. Stone

473 So. 2d 495 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1985

The zoning board refused to grant the Evanses’ request for the variance. … In City of Birmingham v. Mead Corp., 372 So.2d 825 (Ala.1979), however, this Court held that when the governing body of a city determines to annex property, it acts in its legislative capacity.