Opinion

Dunn v. Ponceler

  • 235 Ala. 280
  • 178 So. 47
  • 1937 Ala. LEXIS 363
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Dec 16, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Knight
On the bench
Knight, Anderson, Thomas, Brown
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 71.9%

The opinion

KNIGHT, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit judge directing issuance of

k

*281

temporary injunction, made on the filing of the amended bill, and its presentation to the judge for temporary injunction.

We have had occasion several times heretofore to point out that the order appealed from is not such an interlocutory order from which an appeal is provided.

Section 8307 of the Code providing for appeals in injunction cases, has relation to appeals prosecuted when applications have been granted or refused, after the applications have been set down for hearing under section 8304 of the Code. The injunction was not granted after hearing on the application.

The question is a jurisdictional one, and it is the duty of this court, in such cases, to dismiss the appeal ex mero motu. We are, therefore, compelled to dismiss the appeal. It is so ordered. Lee et al. v. City of Birmingham, 221 Ala. 419 , 128 So. 902 ; Greenwood et al. v. State ex rel. Bailes, Solicitor., 229 Ala. 630 , 159 So. 91 , and Malone et al. v. Kellett, 229 Ala. 648 , 159 So. 95 .

Appeal dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.