Opinion

Webster v. Byrd

  • 494 So. 2d 31
  • 34 Educ. L. Rep. 1290
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Jul 25, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Steagall
On the bench
Houston, Steagall
Cited by
30 cases

holding that a tenured state college teacher’s termination hearing and all communications made “in the course of’ said hearing were quasi-judicial

How later courts described this case

  • holding that a tenured state college teacher’s termination hearing and all communications made “in the course of’ said hearing were quasi-judicial
  • "The majority view, and the view we now adopt, is that an absolute privilege attaches to communications made in the course of quasi-judicial proceedings."
  • publication outside the circle of decision-makers is not privileged

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I concur in that part of the majority opinion which holds that the letter of termination written by Byrd is a part of a quasi-judicial proceeding and, therefore, is absolutely privileged. However, I respectfully dissent from that part which reverses the summary judgment in favor of Byrd. *Page 37

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.