Opinion

STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Estate of Hill

  • 505 So. 2d 1240
  • 1987 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1210
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Feb 25, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Holmes
On the bench
Holmes
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

In its brief in support of its application for rehearing, the Department contends that this court erred in relying upon Rule 810-1-4-.12 because that rule has been repealed and was not in effect at the time of the administrative hearing in this case. The Department contends that Rule 810-1-4-.12 has been replaced by Rule 810-1-2-.25 .

We note that this is the first time the Department has raised such a contention. It chose not to file a reply brief, in which it might have responded to the taxpayer's reliance upon Rule 810-1-4-.12.

In any event, contrary to the Department's assertion, it does not appear to this court that Rule 810-1-4-.12 has been repealed. Moreover, while that rule does appear to conflict somewhat with Rule 810-1-2-.25 , *Page 1242

we find Rule 810-1-4-.12 to be specifically applicable.

OPINION EXTENDED; APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

BRADLEY, P.J., and INGRAM, J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.