Opinion

Underwood v. Coffee County Bank

  • 668 So. 2d 10
  • 1994 WL 94263
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Mar 25, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Yates
On the bench
Thigpen, Yates
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

I concur in the result because Underwood failed to counterclaim for and establish an entitlement to damages resulting from a lack of notice or from any unreasonableness of the sale of the automobile. Had she done so, she might have been entitled to a set-off against the total deficiency.

The bank, in my opinion, failed to comply with Ala. Code 1975, § 7-9-504(3), which requires that reasonable notification "be sent by the secured party to the debtor." (Emphasis added.)

Ala. Code 1975, § 7-1-201 (38), defines "send": "to deposit in the mail . . . with postage or cost of transmission provided for and properly addressed." It is undisputed that the bank did not properly address the notice to Underwood.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.