Opinion

City of Dothan v. Brackin

  • 959 So. 2d 678
  • 2006 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 720
  • 2006 WL 3526741
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Dec 8, 2006
Status
Published
Author
Bryan
On the bench
Bryan, Crawley, Murdock, Rationale
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

I concur in the result because I am convinced that Judge Murdock is correct in concluding that "that portion of the main opinion titled `The Charge of Failing to Account for a Traffic Ticket' is dictum." 959 So.2d at 691 (Murdock, J., concurring in part in the rationale and concurring in the result).

The main opinion's treatment of the First Amendment is based upon the premise that Brackin was punished for contact with Turner that did not involve attendance at church. The main opinion should not be interpreted as sanctioning the municipal judge's prohibition of Brackin's attending the same church as Turner. That prohibition violated Brackin's right to attend the church of her choice, which is protected by the First Amendment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.