"the juvenile court could have concluded that [the parent] was not credible or that, given his history, [the parent's] allegedly improved circumstances were an anomaly"
How later courts described this case
- "the juvenile court could have concluded that [the parent] was not credible or that, given his history, [the parent's] allegedly improved circumstances were an anomaly"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
While it may be prudent for this court to review evidence regarding the first prong of the Ex parte Beasley , 564 So.2d 950 (Ala. 1990), test in the termination-of-parental-rights case, I do not believe that, with regard to A.A. and M.J., "it is necessary," as stated by the main opinion, because that issue was not raised on appeal by A.A. or M.J.