Opinion

Anderson v. Amberson

  • 905 So. 2d 811
  • 2004 WL 2201250
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Oct 1, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Murdock
On the bench
Murdock, Thompson
Cited by
2 cases

"`"[W]here matters outside the pleadings are considered on a motion to dismiss, the motion is converted into a motion for summary judgment . . . regardless of its denomination and treatment by the trial court."'" (quoting Phillips v. AmSouth Bank,833 So.2d 29, 31 (Ala. 2002), quoting in turn Boles v. Blackstock,484 So.2d 1077, 1079 (Ala. 1986))

How later courts described this case

  • "`"[W]here matters outside the pleadings are considered on a motion to dismiss, the motion is converted into a motion for summary judgment . . . regardless of its denomination and treatment by the trial court."'" (quoting Phillips v. AmSouth Bank,833 So.2d 29, 31 (Ala. 2002), quoting in turn Boles v. Blackstock,484 So.2d 1077, 1079 (Ala. 1986))

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Because I believe a genuine issue of material fact exists with respect to the validity of the release (at least with respect to the issue discussed in Part I of the majority opinion), I respectfully dissent from that part of the majority opinion affirming in part the summary judgment entered by the trial court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.