Opinion

Ex Parte Fields

  • 432 So. 2d 1290
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Jun 3, 1983
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Adams, Jones
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.0%

"the Bessemer Division is given exclusive jurisdiction of civil suits based upon causes of action arising in the Bessemer Division and limited to causes of action arising therein"

How later courts described this case

  • "the Bessemer Division is given exclusive jurisdiction of civil suits based upon causes of action arising in the Bessemer Division and limited to causes of action arising therein"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I respectfully dissent. How can the situs of the County Planning and Zoning Commission hearing establish jurisdiction as between the Birmingham and Bessemer Divisions of Jefferson County? The pertinent question is: What is the subject matter of the litigation? In my opinion, the answer — *Page 1294

the zoning of real property located exclusively within the Bessemer cut-off — is determinative of the jurisdiction under the local act creating a Bessemer Division. The cause of action arose where the land is situated and not in the hearing room of the Planning and Zoning Commission. See my dissent in Mead Corporation v. City of Birmingham , 295 Ala. 14 , 321 So.2d 655

(1975).

ALMON, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.