Opinion

Pankajkumar S. Patel v. U.S. Attorney General

  • 917 F.3d 1319
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Mar 6, 2019
Status
Published
Author
Newsom
On the bench
Tjoflat, Marcus, Newsom
Nature of suit
NEW
Cited by
11 cases

Vacated in part by Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney General, 971 F.3d 1258 (2020)

explaining that the plain meaning rule of statutory interpretation and its limited exceptions restrict the policy predilections of judges who are charged with enforcing legislative decrees rather than their independent political perspectives

How later courts described this case

  • explaining that the plain meaning rule of statutory interpretation and its limited exceptions restrict the policy predilections of judges who are charged with enforcing legislative decrees rather than their independent political perspectives

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge, concurring:

I concur in the judgment, and I join in the Court's opinion except for footnotes 4 and 5, which seem to me unnecessary to the resolution of the case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.