Opinion

People Ex Rel. Brenza v. Edwards

  • 413 Ill. 514
  • 109 N.E.2d 754
  • 1952 Ill. LEXIS 419
Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 20, 1952
Status
Published
Author
Fulton
On the bench
MacLeish
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.7%

The opinion

Mr. Justice Fulton, dissenting:

I cannot agree with the majority opinion in this case. It appears to me that the law is well settled in Illinois that money derived from a tax levy for one purpose cannot be spent for another purpose; that the funds cannot be commingled, and that taxes are in effect a trust fund to be used only for the purpose levied. Knopf v. People ex rel. City of Chicago 185 Ill. 20 ; People ex rel. Schlaeger v. Richè, 396 Ill. 85 .

It is my conclusion that if taxpayers have the right to know the purposes for which money raised by taxes is to be spent, and to be assured that, when raised, it will be spent for those purposes, it is equally true that the taxpayer has the right to insist that any losses of revenue due to refunds occasioned by an illegal levy, be confined to those funds and purposes for which the appropriated funds were originally proposed to be spent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.