Opinion

Dannat v. . Fuller

  • 120 N.Y. 554
  • 31 N.Y. St. Rep. 825
  • 75 Sickels 554
  • 24 N.E. 815
  • 1890 N.Y. LEXIS 1292
Court
New York Court of Appeals
Filed
Jun 10, 1890
Status
Published
Author
Bbown
On the bench
Bbown, Haight
Cited by
22 cases

The opinion

Bbown, J.,

dissenting upon the ground that under the findings of fact made by the referee, the proposition discussed by Judge Haight is not available to the appellant in this court. The point is not made in the appellant’s brief and was not argued orally and does not appear even to have been raised in the case.

All concur, except Bbown, J., dissenting, Bradley, J., not voting and Follett, Ch. J. not sitting.

Judgment reversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.