Opinion

People v. Williams

  • 193 Ill. 2d 306
  • 250 Ill. Dec. 692
  • 739 N.E.2d 455
Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 12, 2000
Status
Published
Author
Harrison
On the bench
McMorrow, Harrison
Cited by
380 cases
Authority
More cited than 13.1%

noting that "`the presence or absence of self-interest'" is a factor to be considered in determining whether the spontaneous declaration exception is applicable (quoting House, 141 Ill.2d at 382, 152 Ill.Dec. 572, 566 N.E.2d 259)

How later courts described this case

  • noting that "`the presence or absence of self-interest'" is a factor to be considered in determining whether the spontaneous declaration exception is applicable (quoting House, 141 Ill.2d at 382, 152 Ill.Dec. 572, 566 N.E.2d 259)
  • noting that “ ‘the presence or absence of self-interest’ ” is a factor to be considered in determining whether the spontaneous declaration exception is applicable (quoting House, 141 Ill. 2d at 382 )
  • recognizing that plain error may be raised in a reply brief to avoid forfeiture
  • accountability conviction affirmed where evidence that the defendant intended to participate in the common design of murder included her planning the offense, attempting to obtain a gun in the weeks preceding the murders, informing people she was carrying a baby with the name of the victims’ son, and subsequently telling people that the victims’ son was hers

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I agree that Williams’ convictions should not be disturbed. In my view, however, her sentence of death cannot be allowed to stand. For the reasons set forth in my partial concurrence and partial dissent in People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179 (1998), the Illinois death penalty law is void and unenforceable because it violates the eighth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution (U.S. Const., amends. VIII, XIV) and article I, section 2, of the Illinois Constitution (Ill. Const. 1970, art. I, § 2). Williams’ sentence of death should therefore be vacated, and she should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment. 720 ILCS 5/9 — l(j) (West 1994). Because Williams was found guilty of murdering more than one victim, the term of her imprisonment must be natural life. 730 ILCS 5/5 — 8—l(a)(l)(c)(ii) (West 1994).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.