stating that the guaranty fund was "wholly within the control of the state banking board”
How later courts described this case
- stating that the guaranty fund was "wholly within the control of the state banking board”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
The material questions presented in the motion for rehearing are, we think, substantially the same as those we attempted to dispose of in our original opinion, and we do not feel clear that we can add anything of particular benefit to what is there said and implied, and to all of which we can do no better than to adhere. The motion for rehearing is accordingly overruled.
The motion for additional findings will also_ be overruled, as we conclude that the findings sought are either immaterial, or evidentiary in character, or appear undisputed, in neither of which events is it our duty to make additional findings.