Opinion

Marsh v. State

  • 16 Ala. App. 597
  • 80 So. 171
  • 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 273
Court
Alabama Court of Appeals
Filed
May 28, 1918
Status
Published
On the bench
Brown
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 12.2%

The opinion

On Rehearing.

[6] While it would not constitute reversible error for .the trial court to permit questions of the character here . involved, although they technically violate the rule against allowing questions that assume facts of which there is no evidence (Gilliland v. Dunn & Co., 136 Ala. 327 , 34 South. 25 ), tHfe court does not commit error in upholding the rule by sustaining an appropriate objection to such question.

We did not overlook the fact that the state’s witness Mrs. Lee was also impeached, but we do not see the pertinency of the fact to the question presented for review.

Application overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.