no Miranda warnings required prior to a postconviction psychosexual evaluation because it is more akin to a presentence interview than the pretrial competency evaluation in Estelle
How later courts described this case
- no Miranda warnings required prior to a postconviction psychosexual evaluation because it is more akin to a presentence interview than the pretrial competency evaluation in Estelle
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING
March 7, 1995
The petitions for rehearing filed by appel-lees the Board of Regulatory Commissioners ■ of the State of New Jersey, the Division of the Ratepayer Advocate, and the Jersey Central Power & Light Company in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petitions for rehearing are denied.