Opinion

Kruzits v. Okuma MacHine Tool, Inc.

  • 40 F.3d 52
  • 1994 WL 636464
Court
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed
Nov 15, 1994
On the bench
Greenberg, Roth, Rosenn, Sloviter, Becker, Stapleton, Mansmann, Hutchinson, Scirica, Cowen, Nygaard, Alito, Lewis, McKee, Sarokin
Cited by
6 cases

“Pennsylvania courts generally honor the intent of the contracting parties and enforce choice of law provisions in contracts executed by them.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Pennsylvania courts generally honor the intent of the contracting parties and enforce choice of law provisions in contracts executed by them.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING

Dec. 14, 1994

Before: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, and BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, SAROKIN, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.

The petition for rehearing filed by the appellee, Vincent W. Visco, d/b/a Vistek Industries, in the above captioned matter having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the court in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service not having voted for rehearing by the court in banc, the petition for rehearing is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.