Opinion

Hordin v. City of Cleveland

77 Ohio App. 491
43 Ohio Law. Abs. 515
33 Ohio Op. 336
62 N.E.2d 889
1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 572

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed: Jul 9, 1945
Status: Published
Author: Morgan
On the bench: Skeel, Morgan, Lieghley
Cited by: 6 cases

The opinion

MORGAN, J.,

concurs in the decree for defendants on the first cause of action but DISSENTS from the similar decree on the second cause of action for the reason that property and assets of the Railway Advertising Company were property and assets of the “transit system” within the meaning of Sec. 113-3 of the City Charter and therefore could not be disposed of without the consent of the City Council.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.