Opinion

Gomez v. Atkins

  • 296 F.3d 253
  • 2002 WL 1478343
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jul 11, 2002
Status
Published
Author
Hamilton
On the bench
Wilkinson, King, Hamilton
Cited by
53 cases

noting that in an assessment of objective reasonableness it is significant that an officer arrested a defendant only after first seeking and procuring the approval of a detached district court magistrate as this was a proper course of action

How later courts described this case

  • noting that in an assessment of objective reasonableness it is significant that an officer arrested a defendant only after first seeking and procuring the approval of a detached district court magistrate as this was a proper course of action
  • “While polygraphs are generally not admissible at trial, such tests are a well-recognized law enforcement technique, and a reasonable officer might take their results into account in assessing probable cause.”
  • murder charge against Gomez dismissed due to exculpatory results of scientific tests on victim's fingernail scrapings and loose hairs found on her body
  • “While officers ‘may not disregard readily available exculpatory evidence ... the failure to pursue a potentially exculpatory lead is not sufficient to negate probable cause.’ ”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge,

concurring:

For the reasons expressed by the court today, I agree with the court that Sergeant Atkins is entitled to qualified immunity because, notwithstanding the factual inaccuracies in Sergeant Atkins’ report, an objective law enforcement officer reasonably could have believed that probable cause existed for the arrest of Isidro. Therefore, I join the court’s opinion.

I write separately only to express my disdain for Sergeant Atkins’ inclusion of the material factual inaccuracies, described in Footnote 2 of the court’s opinion, in his report. These material factual inaccuracies, which dealt with. the heart of the State’s case, i.e., whether Isidro murdered his first wife, should not have been in Sergeant Atkins’ report. While the presence of these material factual inaccuracies in the report do not prevent Sergeant Atkins from invoking qualified immunity, it is' nevertheless a .disturbing commentary on the manner in which law enforcement activities are conducted in Cumberland County, North Carolina.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.