refusing to look at regulations accompanying a statute to clarify whether a statute unambiguously conditioned the States’ receipt of federal moneys
How later courts described this case
- refusing to look at regulations accompanying a statute to clarify whether a statute unambiguously conditioned the States’ receipt of federal moneys
- adopting original dissenting panel opinion of Luttig, J.
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
MICHAEL, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the judgment:
Because I agree with the point in the majority’s adopted opinion that the right here can be forfeited, I concur in the judgment.