refusing to look at regulations accompanying a statute to clarify whether a statute unambiguously conditioned the States’ receipt of federal moneys
How later courts described this case
- refusing to look at regulations accompanying a statute to clarify whether a statute unambiguously conditioned the States’ receipt of federal moneys
- adopting original dissenting panel opinion of Luttig, J.
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge,
concurring in the judgment:
Because Part I of the majority opinion, with which I am in complete accord, adequately disposes of the matter, I would not reach the Tenth Amendment analysis. Accordingly, I concur in Part I of the majority opinion and in the judgment of the court.
Judge Ervin has joined this opinion.