Opinion

State v. Puckett

  • 191 Ohio App. 3d 747
  • 947 N.E.2d 730
  • 2010 Ohio 6597
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 28, 2010
Status
Published
Author
Harsha
On the bench
McFarland, Harsha
Cited by
41 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.5%

failure to object waives all but plain error

How later courts described this case

  • failure to object waives all but plain error

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Harsha, Judge,

concurring.

{¶ 40} I agree with the analysis of the principal opinion but note that because the corpus delicti rule is foundational in character, the rules of evidence are generally not applicable in the admissibility analysis. See In re W.B. II, Highland App. No. 08CA18, 2009-Ohio-1707 , 2009 WL 961500 , at ¶ 32. Accordingly, both the trial court and this court can consider hearsay, if it is deemed rehable, in deciding whether the appellant’s confession is admissible.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.