Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Miller

  • 194 Ohio App. 3d 307
  • 956 N.E.2d 319
  • 2011 Ohio 1403
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 25, 2011
Status
Published
Author
Hall
On the bench
Fain, Grady, Hall
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

Hall, Judge,

concurring.

{¶ 60} I concur in judgment because the imprecise documentation provided by the plaintiff, coupled with that part of defendant’s affidavit that is admissible, raises a genuine issue of fact on the singular issue whether plaintiff is the current holder of the note. Although the assignments of error are interrelated, I don’t *319 believe that the defendants have satisfied their reciprocal burden to provide admissible evidence with regard to other issues.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.