Opinion

Moran v. Riverfront Diversified, Inc.

  • 197 Ohio App. 3d 471
  • 968 N.E.2d 1
  • 2011 Ohio 6328
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 9, 2011
Status
Published
Author
Froelich
On the bench
Hall, Donovan, Froelich
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

Froelich, Judge,

concurring in judgment.

{¶ 35} I concur in the judgment. Although Ohio law favors arbitration, I am just not as sure, especially prior to the evidentiary hearing required by our remand, that there is no procedural or substantive unconscionability in the relationship between this buyer and this seller.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.