Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Agopian

  • 112 Ohio St. 3d 103
  • 858 N.E.2d 368
  • 2006 Ohio 6510
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 27, 2006
Status
Published
Author
Lanzinger
On the bench
O'Donnell, Resnick, Pfeifer, Stratton, Moyer, O'Connor, Lanzinger
Cited by
51 cases

holding that mitigating evidence demonstrating that Agopian had no prior disciplinary record, had fully cooperated with the disciplinary process, had accepted responsibility for his conduct, and had provided over 40 character references counseled against impos *213 ing a greater sanction

How later courts described this case

  • holding that mitigating evidence demonstrating that Agopian had no prior disciplinary record, had fully cooperated with the disciplinary process, had accepted responsibility for his conduct, and had provided over 40 character references counseled against impos *213 ing a greater sanction

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Lanzinger, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 16} I respectfully dissent. I would impose a one-year stayed suspension as recommended by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., concur in the foregoing opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.