Opinion

Morgan v. Daxon

  • 49 P.3d 687
  • 2001 OK 104
  • 2001 WL 1533355
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 4, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Opala, Katuger, Summers, Lavender
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 72.9%

The opinion

ORDER

11 Original jurisdiction is assumed. We find that the petitioners have standing to bring the tendered issue. Hendrick v. Walters, 1998 OK 162 , 15, 865 P.2d 1282, 1286-1237 . The challenged bill contains more than one subject and is therefore unconstitutional under the provisions of Const. art. V, §§ 56 and 57 of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma. Campbell v. White, 1993 OK 89 , 11 20, 856 P.2d 255, 268 .

12 The "Motion to Intervene as Respondent," filed by Stratton Taylor, President Pro Tempore of the Oklahoma State Senate, is granted. The Intervenor's request that the Court continue this case is denied.

3 Let writ of prohibition issue prohibiting the respondents from releasing any funds to state agencies pursuant to House Bill 1570 as passed by the 48th Oklahoma Legislature.

{4 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT THIS 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2001.

15 CONCUR: HARGRAVE, C.J., WATT, V.C.J., HODGES, OPALA (BY SEPARATE WRITING), BOUDREAU, WINCHESTER, JJ.

T6 CONCURS IN PART; DISSENTS IN PART: KAUGER (BY SEPARATE WRITING), J.

T7 DISSENT: LAVENDER, (JOINS SUMMERS, J.), SUMMERS (BY SEPARATE WRITING), JJ.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.