Opinion

State v. Allen

  • 248 Or. 376
  • 434 P.2d 740
  • 1967 Ore. LEXIS 423
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Dec 6, 1967
Status
Published
Author
Sloan
On the bench
Perry, McAllister, Sloan, O'Connell, Denecke, Holman, Lusk
Cited by
15 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.3%

The opinion

SLOAN, J.,

dissenting.

It seems clear in this case that defendant was pressed by interrogation after he had asked for an attorney and after he had said he did not want to talk. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the dissents of Justice Denecke in State v. Atherton, 1966, 242 Or 621, 629 , 410 P2d 208 , and in State v. Rosenburger, *385 1966, 242 Or 376, 380 , 409 P2d 684 , and in Ms specially concurring opinion in State v. Beaver, 1967, 248 Or 101 , 432 P2d 509 , I think the confession was inadmissible and the case should be reversed.

Denecke, J., joins in this dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.