wisdom or expediency of particular annexations is not a judicial question and courts can go no further than to see that the existing law is observed.
How later courts described this case
- wisdom or expediency of particular annexations is not a judicial question and courts can go no further than to see that the existing law is observed.
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SCHAUER, J.
I concur generally in the view of the law as developed in Mr. Justice Carter’s dissenting opinion and join in the conclusion that the judgment should be reversed.