Opinion

State v. Wm. Lester Schleigh

  • 210 Or. 155
  • 310 P.2d 341
  • 1957 Ore. LEXIS 253
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 17, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Eossman
On the bench
Peeey, Eossman, Perry, Rossman, Brand, McAllister
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 11.2%

repeated fires by spontaneous combustion unlikely; eight fires along one country road immediately after defend ant, Ms father and others drove by show “a deliberate plan to set them”

How later courts described this case

  • repeated fires by spontaneous combustion unlikely; eight fires along one country road immediately after defend ant, Ms father and others drove by show “a deliberate plan to set them”
  • repeated fires by spontaneous combustion unlikely; eight fires along one country road immediately after defend *136 ant, Ms father and others drove by show “a deliberate plan to set them”
  • repeated fires by spontaneous combustion unlikely; eight fires along one country road immediately after defendant, his father and others drove by show "a deliberate plan to set them"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

EOSSMAN, J.,

specially concurring.

I do not believe that State v. Wallace, 170 Or 60 , 131 P2d 222 , which Mr. Justice Brand’s decision mentions frequently, is applicable to this case. In all other respects I concur in his opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.