Opinion

Bradshaw v. Oklahoma State Election Board

  • 75 O.B.A.J. 2217
  • 98 P.3d 1092
  • 2004 OK 69
  • 2004 Okla. LEXIS 76
  • 2004 WL 1807950
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Aug 13, 2004
Status
Published
On the bench
Watt, Opala, Boudreau, Edmondson, Simms, Hodges, Hargrave, Kauger, Lavender, Winchester
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.7%

The opinion

ORDER

1 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed and a writ of mandamus is hereby issued. The Oklahoma State Election Board is directed to place petitioner's name on the Oklahoma general election ballot as an Independent candidate for the office of United States Representative for the 4th District of Oklahoma. The provisions of 26 0.8. Supp.2004 § 5-105 *1093 are, by their express terms, uninvocable against candidates for federal offices.

12 Glo Henley, Kenneth Monroe and Thomas E. Prince, to the extent that they are named in the caption hereof in their individual capacities, are not proper parties respondent. These individuals are proper parties respondent only in their official capacities as members of the Oklahoma State Election Board.

T3 Petitioner's request for costs and an attorney's fee is denied. Rule 1.191(}) of the Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules.

[4 WATT, C.J., OPALA, V.C.J., BOUDREAU and EDMONDSON, JJ. and SIMMS, SJ., concur; HODGES, HARGRAVE and KAUGER, JJ., dissent; LAVENDER, J., not participating; WINCHESTER, J., disqualified.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.