stating that the Department made referrals for the parent with history of substance abuse to “drug treatment programs, parenting classes, job skills classes, housing assistance, and supervised visitation assistance” (internal footnote omitted)
How later courts described this case
- stating that the Department made referrals for the parent with history of substance abuse to “drug treatment programs, parenting classes, job skills classes, housing assistance, and supervised visitation assistance” (internal footnote omitted)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
HARRELL, J., concurring, in which MURPHY, J., joins.
I join the judgment in this case. I concur with the Majority-opinion’s result and analysis, except for its Footnote 8 (Maj. op. at 710-11, 12 A.3d at 134-36). The reasons for my disagreement with this footnote are explained in my concurring opinion in In Re: Adoption of Ta’Niya C., 417 Md. 90 , 8 A.3d 745 (2010) (concurring opinion by Harrell, J., joined by Murphy, J.).
Judge MURPHY authorizes me to state that he joins the views expressed in this concurring opinion.