Opinion

Ex Parte Worley

  • 46 So. 3d 916
  • 2009 Ala. LEXIS 299
  • 2009 WL 5173505
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Dec 30, 2009
Status
Published
Author
Woodall
On the bench
Parker, Lyons, Stuart, Smith, Cobb, Woodall, Shaw
Cited by
11 cases

discussing the application of § 14 immunity, and the relevance of § 112, to the Secretary of State

How later courts described this case

  • discussing the application of § 14 immunity, and the relevance of § 112, to the Secretary of State
  • “Section 41-22-20 provides the procedure for soliciting judicial review of final decisions of administrative agencies within the State.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

WOODALL, Justice

(concurring in the result).

I concur in the result. All of Tatum’s claims are clearly barred by the immunity afforded Worley and Chapman by § 14, Ala. Const.1901.

COBB, C.J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.