Opinion

Johnson Timber Corp. v. Sturdivant

  • 295 Ark. 622
  • 752 S.W.2d 241
  • 1988 Ark. LEXIS 269
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Jun 6, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Hickman
On the bench
Purtle, Hickman, Glaze, Gibson
Cited by
17 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.9%

" 'Payment of workers’ compensation insurance premiums is evidence relating to the status as employer-employee[.]”

How later courts described this case

  • " 'Payment of workers’ compensation insurance premiums is evidence relating to the status as employer-employee[.]”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Darrell Hickman, Justice, concurring. I wholeheartedly agree with the majority decision. I write separately only to point out that I was one of two members of the court who dissented in Newton & Fitzgerald v. Clark, 266 Ark. 237 , 582 S.W.2d 955 (1979). I find the facts of that case, which involved the appellant Georgia-Pacific, and the legal arguments made there, very similar to those in this case. There are even more compelling arguments present in this case to justify the action taken by the trial court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.