remanding for a new punishment trial after reversing five of six acts of theft, reducing the cumulative amount
How later courts described this case
- remanding for a new punishment trial after reversing five of six acts of theft, reducing the cumulative amount
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
CLINTON, J.,
dissents because Sec. 31.09 “creates one offense which cannot be severed. Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275, 278 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).