Opinion

Adkins v. State

  • 717 S.W.2d 363
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2220
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 836
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Oct 1, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Onion
On the bench
Davis, Onion, Teague
Cited by
29 cases

holding that the actual procurement of a warrant does not preclude use of exigent circumstances to justify a search in the event a warrant fails

How later courts described this case

  • holding that the actual procurement of a warrant does not preclude use of exigent circumstances to justify a search in the event a warrant fails
  • "[T]he actual procuring of a warrant does not preclude the use of exigent circumstances to justify a search, should the warrant fail."
  • affidavit insufficient because it did not indicate wheth er the source of the tip was direct observation or reliable hearsay, it did not indicate a basis for the informant's reliability such as past performance, and it did not explain the nexus between the original tip and the officer's corroborative details
  • considering automobile warrant exception

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ONION, Judge,

dissenting.

I dissent to the remand to the Court of Appeals. The case has already been reversed on other grounds. I would decide the exigent circumstances question here. We needlessly keep too many cases in appellate orbit.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.