The opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR TRANSFER TO SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
PER CURIAM.
In a motion for rehearing or, in the alternative, to transfer this ease to the Supreme Court of Missouri, Appellant avers she presented the claims of error in points I and IV to the circuit court in a brief filed there February 24, 1992. Attached to Appellant’s motion is a copy of a 43-page document identified by Appellant as her circuit court brief. That document was not in the record on appeal when this Court adopted its opinion October 26, 1993.
This Court is confined to the record presented to it. State ex rel. Kairuz v. Romines, 806 S.W.2d 451, 453 [1] (Mo.App.E.D.1991); Williams v. Clean Coverall Supply Co., Inc., 613 S.W.2d 659, 664 [10] (Mo.App.E.D.1980). An appealing party desiring review of an issue has the duty to furnish all records relating thereto, and in the absence of such there is nothing for review. York v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 813 S.W.2d 61, 62 [2] (Mo.App.E.D.1991); Yung v. Yung, 775 S.W.2d 343, 344 (Mo.App.E.D.1989).
We decline to consider, after opinion, items not in the record when the opinion is adopted. To do otherwise would condone untimely, piecemeal assembly of the record on appeal, adding chaos and delay in the appellate process.
Appellant’s motion for rehearing or, in the alternative, to transfer this case to the Supreme Court of Missouri is denied.