holding that compelling disclosure of blood donors’ identities was not an impermissible violation of constitutional right to privacy
How later courts described this case
- holding that compelling disclosure of blood donors’ identities was not an impermissible violation of constitutional right to privacy
- holding that the disclosure of blood donors' identities was not an impermissible violation of constitutional right to privacy
- noting that medical records are within constitutionally protected zone of privacy
- declaring identities of blood donors discoverable in civil proceeding
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
LATTIMORE, Justice,
concurring.
I concur with the opinion of Justice Far-ris. We should not assume the occurrence of the worst eventuality. The trial court has it within its power to prevent the consequences not threatened by the parties, but envisioned by the dissenting opinion.