holding that expert’s conclusory statements regarding officer’s good faith were insufficient to support or defeat summary judgment
How later courts described this case
- holding that expert’s conclusory statements regarding officer’s good faith were insufficient to support or defeat summary judgment
- holding that administrative segregation is not per se unconstitutional
- prisoner alleged that he was held in administrative segregation for filing grievance and lawsuit
- setting out elements of civil conspiracy
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
PER CURIAM.
Dan Thomas, appellant, has filed a motion for rehearing en banc. After due consideration, we overrule the motion for rehearing en banc.
It is so Ordered.
SCHNEIDER, C.J., and COHEN, MIRABAL, O’CONNOR, WILSON, HEDGES, ANDELL, TAFT and NUCHIA, JJ., not participating.
O’CONNOR, J., dissenting.